Training the Singing Voice - online book

An exploration of the theories, methods & techniques of Voice training.

Home | Main Menu | Singing & Playing | Order & Order Info | Support | Search
«8                         TRAINING THE SINGING VOICE
be formulated. However, insofar as voice training does not rely upon the exact sciences (e.g., in psychology, philosophy, aesthetics) exact predeter­minations of teaching outcomes are not possible. Hence standardizations are impossible. [518, p. 89] "There can be only one set of [teaching] prin­ciples/* says Mowe. "As long as we are working toward the same goal, it isn't of primary importance which road we take." Therefore, any method is a good method if it does not conflict with the general objectives of vocal teac.hing
OrtmaiHi believes that tht wide discrepancies among voice methods are "more imaginary than real/* [437] "If two differing methods both get re­sults, there must be something common to both of them that is of value." An effective vocal pedagogy should encompass the basic truths of method­ology and discard the half-truths, even if they have become "hallowed by hoary tradition." [Bartholomew 38] Kerstin Thorborg believes that the fundamental techniques of voice building are the same for all singers, "regardless of range or quality" of voice. [611; also Novello-Davies 430, p. 139] Gescheidt likewise insists that teaching techniques can be stand­ardized since individual differences are anatomical rather than physiologi­cal and vocal coordinations involving muscular training are alike for all singers- [200, p. 7] Wilson feels that basic principles are the same for all, "although different voices have individual problems." The use of a com­mon basic approach makes group teaching possible. [674, Foreword; also SamoHoff 484, p. 6; Allen 7, p. 22] The following nine attributes of cor­rect singing, according to Barbareux-Farry, are developed by techniques that can be standardized. They are: 1) a perfecdy tuned pitch throughout the vocal range; 2) a uniformity of resonance on each tone; 3) delicacy of touch, spontaneity and freedom of utterance throughout the voice; 4) well balanced pianissimo to fortissimo controls on separate and connected tones; 5) mastery of legato and staccato techniques; 6) a well poised mezza voce; 7) standard diction; 8) sincerity of interpretadon; 9) facial expres­sion and posture well disposed. She warns, however, that the danger of all systems of voice culture is the loss of individuality through mechanical over-training. [34, p. 183 and p. 140]
Opposing standardization. The opinions against standardization of teaching methods are epitomized in the argument that each individual must be treated differently because no two voices are exactly alike. [James 300, p. 9; Hffl 272, p. 53] According to Caruso, there are as many meth­ods as there are singers and one singer's method might be entirely useless to another who tried it. Only the musical part of a vocal education can be standardized. [Marafioti 368, p. 156 and p. 16] Other representative state­ments supporting this belief are: